Forum Replies Created

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Perils of Wading #21788
    Forbringer
    Participant

    Hi Joe,

    This is a great contribution to increasing our level of awareness about a topic that is too often overlooked.  I’m going to copy and file this in the same folder with information about the various fishing licenses I have so I can periodically access and review it.

    Thanks again for this info!

    Lou Forbringer

     

    in reply to: Euro nymphing vs. fishing with a mono rig. #20805
    Forbringer
    Participant

    Steve,

    Apparently you are not the only person who is interested in clarifying the difference between Euro Nymphing Fly Line vs The Mono Rig. Domenick Swentosky, author of Troutbitten just posed this article yesterday  (Jan 4, 2021).

    Euro Nymphing Fly Line vs The Mono Rig

    Happy reading!

    Lou Forbringer

    in reply to: Fishing in New England States #10850
    Forbringer
    Participant

    Here is another resource to consider.   It’s The Compleat Angler  newsletter.  It provides reports for various areas in the Northeast for both fresh and salt water.  Find it by entering The Compleat Angler Website in your browser and sign up for their newsletter.  It appears as: The Compleat Angler | Your #1 Source for Fly Fishing‎.

    Stay safe and stay healthy!

    Lou Forbringer

    in reply to: Fishing in New England States #10581
    Forbringer
    Participant

    Of course it depends on time of year and what part of New England.

    If you will be around Bangor Maine, call Mike Hegarty (207) 356-6773 or email [email protected].  He fishes for smallmouth, brook trout and landlocked salmon.  His season runs from May to October.

    If you will be in Massachusetts and want to do some salt water fishing (e.g., striped bass or tuna) call Peter Yukins, Molly Jean Charters (978) 500-5927.  I think his season runs from July to September.

    I have fished with both of them and recommend them without reservation.  They have all the equipment you’ll need and are both very entertaining characters in additon to being knowledgable guides.

    If you contact them, tell them “Hello” from me.

    Regards, Lou Forbringer

     

    in reply to: Wading Staff #9499
    Forbringer
    Participant

    Hi Glenn,

    I own a Folstaf brand, which I like.  I’ve posted the item number and the overall review ratings from LLBean.

    It list for $125, but LLBean runs 20% off sales periodically.

    Folstaf Wading Staff
    Item #: TA112590
    ★★★★★ 50 Reviews

     

    I am also including a post from the Troutbitten Blog (which I love) that provides some thoughts on selecting a wading staff.  You may need to cut and paste it in your browser.

    https://troutbitten.com/?s=wading+staff&cat=-1&tag=0

    Regards,

    Lou Forbringer

    Forbringer
    Participant

    All,

    Below is an email update I recieved today regarding the definition of a “fly”.  It appears our writing campaign has paid off.  Congratulations to all who helped bring attention and clarity to the issue.   Well done!

    Regards,

    Lou

     

    Good afternoon Mr. Forbringer.  I just wanted to provide an update on our discussions related to this issue. I hope the following is helpful.

    In recent months, due to public interest and the need for consistency, Protection and Fisheries division staff have been evaluating how the fly definition is interpreted and how it interacts with the other definitions of flies, lures, and baits.   During this process, a document from the original 2004 Wildlife Code change was discovered.  This document provided further guidance of the original intention of the regulation change.

    Below is an excerpt from the original document outlining how the new definitions were to be interpreted.
    <p style=”text-align: left;”>1. The use of the phrase “…any material…” in the fly definition allows fly tiers and anglers to use the    wide variety of natural and synthetic materials currently available and eliminates the list, never all-inclusive, of approved materials.  This should eliminate a great deal of confusion and allow more consistent interpretation of this definition.  Flies containing rubber legs, foam, leather, beads, cork and a number of other materials will now conform to the definition of what is permitted in a “fly.”</p>
    As you can see, the original intention was to allow any material to be used in the construction of a fly.  Flies however cannot be lures defined as soft plastic bait or natural and scented bait.  As an example, a rubber worm cannot be permanently attached to a single hook and be considered a fly because a synthetic worm meets the definition of soft plastic bait.  However, rubber legs or antennae on a fly would be permissible.

    Thank you for bringing this question and issue to our attention.  I hope this explanation provided some additional clarity into the use of flies. Again, just to be clear, the fly in the photo within the e-mail chain below is a “fly” and can be used in “fly only” zones/water.

    Please feel free to contact me or your local Conservation Agent if you have any questions or we can provide additional information.

    Brian D. Canaday

    Fisheries Division Chief

    Missouri Department of Conservation

    2901 West Truman Blvd.

    P.O. Box 180

    Jefferson City, Missouri  65102

    573-522-4115 *3174 (office)

    573-508-9491 (work cell)

    573-526-0990 (fax)

    [email protected]

    Forbringer
    Participant

    Below is an email thread concerning the interpretation of what is a “fly”.  The email also included a picture of the fly described (Copper John Rubber Legs-Beadhead) in order to eliminate any ambiguity.

    I’m of the opinion that the regulations, as written and interpreted, do not take into consideration the curent state of the sport, and are overly restrictive.

    Keep up the writing campaign!

    Lou

     

    Good morning Mr. Forbringer.

    Due to the rubber legs,  the fly would not be considered a “fly” but an artificial lure.  It could not be used in areas designated flies only.

    Brian D. Canaday

    Fisheries Division Chief

    Missouri Department of Conservation

    573-522-4115 *3174 (office)

    573-508-9491 (work cell)

    573-526-0990 (fax)

    [email protected]

    ___________________________________________

    From: Louis Forbringer <[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:38 AM
    To: Brian Canaday <[email protected]>
    Subject: Re: Form submission from: Proposed Regulations Comments-Fly definition
     

    Hi Brian,
    Thanks for your response.
    I want to be clear that I am interpreting the regulation correctly, so I’ll ask if the fly depicted below (Copper John Rubber Legs-Beadhead) would be considered legal?
      
    Thanks for your help.
     
    Regards,
    Lou Forbringer

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)